On August 20, 2024, U.S. District Judge Ada Brown in Texas issued a final order in the pending case, Ryan v. FTC, holding that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) exceeded its authority in issuing a ban on noncompete clauses. This ruling effectively halts nationwide the implementation of the FTC’s controversial new rule (the “Rule”) that prohibited the use of most noncompete agreements in the employment setting.
In April 2024 the FTC issued its Rule banning virtually all noncompete agreements in the employment setting, scheduled to become effective on September 4, 2024. The Rule would have required employers to send notices to current and former employees (and contractors) that the employer would no longer enforce any noncompetes after their employment. This ban applied not just to a typical noncompetition covenant, but also to other restrictions that could have the effect of restricting post-employment competition. The Rule also would have required employers to stop including any noncompete or other types of provisions in any of their employment related documents and agreements that would have the effect of restricting post-employment competition.
Since the FTC published this new Rule, there have been three significant challenges in different Federal courts. While results have been mixed, this latest court ruling officially stops the new FTC Rule from taking effect nationwide next month.
For now, businesses that utilize noncompete agreements and similar restrictions can continue to do so without the immediate threat of a federal ban. They still must comply with applicable state laws. However, the federal controversy is far from over. A spokesperson for the FTC has stated that it is “seriously considering an appeal,” and asserted that the decision does not block the FTC’s ability to “address[] noncompetes through case-by-case enforcement actions.” As the FTC considers its next steps, the future of noncompete agreements—and the broader question of worker rights—remains uncertain. Accordingly, while immediate compliance with the Rule is unnecessary, employers should continue to monitor developments in this area, and to think strategically about their use of noncompete provisions and alternative options going forward.
Congress could also step into the arena. The court’s ruling emphasized that while there may be merit to the arguments against noncompete agreements, it is ultimately up to the legislative branch to address these concerns through statutory reform. In addition, the General Counsel for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has asserted that noncompete agreements violate the National Labor Relations Act, a position adopted recently by an NLRB administrative law judge in June. The full NLRB has not yet ratified that decision, although that process could be delayed by recent constitutional challenges to the structure of the NLRB. It is important to note that over the past several years various states have enacted statutes reforming noncompete law at the local level. A bill was introduced in the Florida legislature just last year, but did not pass. There have also been efforts at a federal statutory reform for the past few years, but nothing has been enacted so far.
- Partner
Harold "Hal" Morlan III is a partner in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Governmental Law Practice Group and the Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Task Force.
Hal focuses his practice on the areas of ...
- Partner
Mary Ruth Houston is Co-Managing Partner of the Orlando office and Chair of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Practice Group. She is certified as a mediator in Florida courts and the Middle District of Florida. She was selected as ...
- Partner
Stefan Rubin is a partner in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Corporate Practice Group. He is also a Florida Certified Public Accountant (CPA).
Stefan concentrates his practice in general corporate ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Federal Court Strikes Down the DOL’s Increased Salary Thresholds for Executive, Administrative, Professional, And Highly Compensated Employee Overtime Exemptions
- Breaking News: FinCEN Postpones Beneficial Ownership Reporting Deadlines for Companies Impacted by Recent Major Storms
- What You Need to Know About the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America TIFIA Loan
- Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Implementation of the FTC’s New Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements
- September 4th is Almost Here: How Employers Can Prepare for the Upcoming Effective Date of the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
Popular Categories
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Construction
- Department of Labor
- Business of Real Estate
- Landlord-Tenant
- Construction Litigation
- Real Estate Law
- Salary
- Competition
- Cybersecurity
- Intellectual Property
- Appeals
- Construction
- Contracts
- Litigation
- Trusts and Estates
- Public Private Partnership
- Data Security
- Business
- Supreme Court
- Development/Land Use
- Technology
- IP Litigation
- Privacy
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Patents
- Business
- Public Finance
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Contracting
- Health Care
- Financial Institutions
- Compliance
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Property Tax
- Government
- Conveyances
- Lease
- Appellate Blog
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Cyber fraud
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- Bid Protest
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Arbitration
- International
- Restrictive Covenants
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Promissory Notes
- Title
- Small Business
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- Consumer Privacy
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- International Arbitration
- Liens and encumbrances
- Liens
- Creditor's Rights
- Bidding
- Attorneys' Fees
- Inter Partes Review
- Consumer Protection
- Power Generation
- Regulation
- Venue
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Mortgages
- FINRA
- Record on Appeal
- Rehearing
- Eviction
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Dispute Resolution
- Liens
- Maritime
- Damages
- Briefing
- Request for Proposal
- Patents - Obviousness
- Commercial Brokerage
- Trade Secrets
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Design Professionals
- Certiorari
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Designer Liability
- Lis Pendens
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Banking
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Finality
- Fintech
- Marketing/Advertising
- Preservation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016