
Once you have filed your complaint seeking damages for breach of a lease or guaranty, you are required to serve the party from which you are seeking relief. But what happens when you are having difficulty serving the breaching party because they are either intentionally avoiding service or they have moved out of state?
As a preliminary matter, it’s important to realize that a money judgment obtained without proper personal service may be void and may be set aside if successfully challenged. Even worse, if the statute of limitations has run on your claim, after the defendant sets aside your judgment you won’t be able to refile your claim. So a plaintiff seeking a money judgment must get effective personal service.
There are two common misconceptions as to how a complaint seeking a money judgment must be served.
Common Misconception #1—If you can’t locate a party and personally serve him, you can simply publish a copy of the claim and then get a money judgment. FALSE. You cannot get a valid money judgment by serving a party via publication only. Serving by publication only allows you to get a judgment on property (in rem), like in a foreclosure action—it won’t permit you to get a money judgment for breach of contract.
Common Misconception #2—To obtain personal service (in personam), you must physically serve the individual. FALSE. You can get a money judgment without physically handing a copy of the complaint to a party as more specifically detailed below.
So if you are a party seeking to obtain a money judgment for breach of lease against a guarantor or individual who intentionally evades service or resides out of state, you need to follow the process specifically outlined in Sections 48.161 and 48.181, Fla. Stat. These Sections set forth a little known method of obtaining personal service through a process known as substitute service. At its core, substitute service requires a plaintiff to amend their complaint to allege that a defendant is intentionally avoiding service or has moved out of state, and then requires a plaintiff to complete service through a process that includes serving the Secretary of State.
The Fourth District Court of Appeal has opined that to use substitute service the plaintiff must demonstrate that he attempted to locate the defendant and made an effort to acquire the information necessary to effect personal service. Wiggam v. Bamford, 562 So.2d 389, 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 990). Accordingly, to obtain a money judgment against a nonresident who conducted business in Florida or a resident intentionally concealing his whereabouts to evade service, strict compliance with Sections 48.161 and 48.181 is required.
- Partner
Matthew Sackel is a partner in the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group.
A Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rated attorney, Matthew has extensive trial and ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- HB-3: An Overview of ESG Factors Relating to Public Funds Investment and Financial Industry Impacts
- The Live Local Act Part 2 - Affordable Housing Incentives
- Florida's Live Local Act
- Florida Preliminary Injunctions Must Merely Preserve the Status Quo
- Can a Landlord Obtain Funds Deposited by Tenant in the Court’s Registry?
- Drawn-out negotiations over purchase agreement result in extensive litigation
- In eviction case, trial court wrongly made landlord produce leases with other tenants
Popular Categories
- Litigation
- Contracts
- Landlord-Tenant
- Business
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Supreme Court
- Real Estate Law
- Cyber fraud
- Technology
- Business of Real Estate
- Property Tax
- Development/Land Use
- Cybersecurity
- Data Security
- Conveyances
- Foreclosures
- Estate planning
- Trusts and Estates
- Lease
- Wealth planning
- Business
- Insurance
- Restrictive Covenants
- Title
- Construction
- Promissory Notes
- Regulatory Compliance
- Government
- Creditor's Rights
- Liens and encumbrances
- Compliance
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Eviction
- Bankruptcy
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Appeals
- Attorneys' Fees
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Small Business
- Mortgages
- Loan guaranties
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Maritime
- GAO
- Commercial Brokerage
- Renewal
- email hacking
- Lis Pendens
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016