It’s common for a commercial loan to include an “assignment of rents,” by which the borrower assigns to its lender the rents it gets from the property securing the loan. In Florida, there’s a statute that governs how an assignment of rents works. The assignment of rents can be a powerful tool in the lender’s arsenal. The lender can even foreclose on its lien on the rents without foreclosing on the underlying mortgage.
In Green Emerald Homes, LLC v. Residential Credit Opportunities Trust, an appellate court recently threw a wrench into how the collecting of rents works during some foreclosures. The original mortgage in the case had an assignment of rents provision. A junior lienholder foreclosed on its lien and Green Emerald bought the property at the resulting foreclosure sale. At that point, Green Emerald owned the property, but was not the borrower under the mortgage, and the original borrower was still the borrower, but did not own the property. That fact became critical to the outcome.
A couple of months later, the mortgage (which was still in place after the foreclosure sale) was assigned to Residential Credit. One month after that, Residential Credit filed a foreclosure lawsuit. Residential Credit sent a demand for rents to Green Emerald and the borrowers, but received nothing. As a result, Residential Credit asked the court to order that Green Emerald deposit any rents it collects from the property into the trust account of Residential Credit’s attorneys.
On appeal, the court’s ruling was reversed. Green Emerald agreed that Residential Credit had the right to get the rents, but just not from Green Emerald. Why? Because it was not the borrower. The appellate court agreed. Green Emerald bought the property subject to the mortgage, but Green Emerald did not assume the mortgage.
The court also noted that under the statute, the lender’s lien on rents is effective against third parties once the mortgage is recorded. But the court ruled that the statute does not require a property owner who is not the borrower under the mortgage to assign rents to the lender that are due under some agreement that is not part of the foreclosure. The court did not know whether that was the case with the tenants here, but made clear that rents due under leases originated by the original owner/borrower and which Green Emerald assumed would have to be assigned to Residential Credit. In other words, if Green Emerald collected rent from a tenant under a lease that the original borrower signed, those rents would go to Residential Credit. But if Green Emerald collected rent from a tenant under a lease that Green Emerald signed after it got title to the property, those rents would not go to Residential Credit.
Finally, the court acknowledged that its decision would probably upend a common practice of parties that buy properties at foreclosure sales (leasing up a property and keeping the rents despite the existence of a defaulted mortgage). The court suggested that allowing third-party purchasers of foreclosed properties to collect rents while the mortgage (and maybe taxes and other expenses) goes unpaid isn’t necessarily a good thing. But it’s what the statute requires and the court seemed to hint that the legislature should change it.
- Partner
Matt Chait is the Managing Partner of the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group. His statewide practice focuses on commercial real estate and land use litigation ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- HB-3: An Overview of ESG Factors Relating to Public Funds Investment and Financial Industry Impacts
- The Live Local Act Part 2 - Affordable Housing Incentives
- Florida's Live Local Act
- Florida Preliminary Injunctions Must Merely Preserve the Status Quo
- Can a Landlord Obtain Funds Deposited by Tenant in the Court’s Registry?
- Drawn-out negotiations over purchase agreement result in extensive litigation
- In eviction case, trial court wrongly made landlord produce leases with other tenants
Popular Categories
- Litigation
- Contracts
- Landlord-Tenant
- Business
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Supreme Court
- Real Estate Law
- Cyber fraud
- Technology
- Business of Real Estate
- Property Tax
- Development/Land Use
- Cybersecurity
- Data Security
- Conveyances
- Foreclosures
- Estate planning
- Trusts and Estates
- Lease
- Wealth planning
- Business
- Insurance
- Restrictive Covenants
- Title
- Construction
- Promissory Notes
- Regulatory Compliance
- Government
- Creditor's Rights
- Liens and encumbrances
- Compliance
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Eviction
- Bankruptcy
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Appeals
- Attorneys' Fees
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Small Business
- Mortgages
- Loan guaranties
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Maritime
- GAO
- Commercial Brokerage
- Renewal
- email hacking
- Lis Pendens
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016