Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (“FDUTPA”) prohibits unfair, deceptive, and unconscionable actors or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce—including the purchase and sale of real estate. A consumer’s claim for damages under FDUTPA has three elements: (1) a deceptive act or unfair practice; (2) causation; and (3) actual damages.” Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So.2d 860, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), review denied, 962 So.2d 335 (Fla.2007). An individual must prove actual damages not just consequential damages. “FDUTPA does not provide for the recovery of nominal damages, speculative losses, or compensation for subjective feelings of disappointment.” City First Mortgage Corp. v. Barton, 988 So. 2d (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). In City First Mortgage Corp. v. Barton, the 4th DCA reversed a $312,000 judgment against a mortgage lender that was based on an alleged FDUTPA violation because the borrower failed to prove “actual damages sustained as a consequence of violation of the statute.” Consequential damages, such as the damages stemming from a borrowers inability to refinance due to the mortgage lender’s misrepresentations, are not recoverable under FDUTPA.
Parties strategically allege FDUTPA claims in litigation because FDUTPA allows for the recovery attorney’s fees by “the prevailing party, after judgment in the trial court and exhaustion of all appeals . . from the non-prevailing party[]”. § 501.2105, Fla. Stat. If after asserting a claim for FDUTPA a party later decides not to pursue a FDUTPA claim and dismisses the FDUTPA claim prior to a judgment, it will not result in the recovery of attorney’s fees by the prevailing party. In Black Diamond Properties, Inc. v. Haines, 36 So. 3d 819 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), the Court held that while generally a defendant is a prevailing party and entitled to recover its attorney’s fees when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses an action before any judgment is entered, under FDUTPA, denial of fees was proper because “section 501.2105(1) also requires that there be an entry of judgment before attorney’s fees can be awarded.” Accordingly, because no judgment was entered in Black Diamond Properties, Inc. following a voluntary dismissal, the Court could not award fees under § 501.2105(1), Fla. Stat. Black Diamond Properties, 36 So. 3d at 821 (citing Nolan v. Altman, 449 So. 2d 898, 900-01 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)).
- Partner
Matthew Sackel is a partner in the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group.
A Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ Rated attorney, Matthew has extensive trial and ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- Pith? Perfect for Lienors, Not So Much for Landlords: Protecting Rights When Improvements Are Made to Commercial Tenancies
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- Florida Employers Subject to E-Verify Law Beginning July 1, 2023
Popular Categories
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Business of Real Estate
- Real Estate Law
- Landlord-Tenant
- Employment and Labor
- Cybersecurity
- Development/Land Use
- Intellectual Property
- Construction
- Data Security
- Appeals
- Litigation
- Trusts and Estates
- Contracts
- Supreme Court
- Business
- Privacy
- Technology
- Litigation (Appellate)
- IP Litigation
- Patents
- Business
- Health Care
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Financial Institutions
- Contracting
- Compliance
- Competition
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Property Tax
- Conveyances
- Appellate Blog
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Government
- Lease
- Cyber fraud
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Arbitration
- Restrictive Covenants
- International
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Bid Protest
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Title
- Small Business
- Promissory Notes
- Liens
- Consumer Privacy
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- International Arbitration
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Attorneys' Fees
- Bidding
- Power Generation
- Inter Partes Review
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Venue
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Eviction
- Mortgages
- FINRA
- Record on Appeal
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Dispute Resolution
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Maritime
- Liens
- Damages
- Briefing
- Department of Labor
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Commercial Brokerage
- Trade Secrets
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- email hacking
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Lis Pendens
- Banking
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Fintech
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Florida Public Records Law
- Marketing/Advertising
- Preservation
- Public Private Partnership
- Sunshine Law
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Mootness
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Standing
Editors
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016