Given the choice, a borrower in foreclosure may prefer that a jury determine her fate, rather than a judge. But by statute, “[a]ll mortgages shall be foreclosed in equity” and “foreclosure claim[s] shall, if tried, be tried to the court without a jury.” § 702.01, Fla. Stat. (2012). This is consistent with the concept that, with rare exceptions, “equitable” actions are the province of a judge, not a jury. On the other hand, parties have a constitutional right to demand a jury as to “legal” actions, such as money damages claims for breach of promissory notes. Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co., 404 So. 2d 834, 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
So what happens when a lender simultaneously sues not just for foreclosure but also for a money judgment on the promissory note? Is the borrower entitled to a jury as to the note count?
Kinney v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 165 So.3d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) says “No.” There, Countrywide bought the Kinney’s loan from the original lender then sued the Kinneys to foreclosure on their property for non-payment. But the complaint also included a separate count for a money judgment on the promissory note. After the Kinneys’ request for a jury was denied, the case was tried non-jury and foreclosure granted.
In general, in the absence of an enforceable jury waiver, a borrower would be entitled to a jury on a “legal” claim, such as one seeking a money judgment on a note. See, Padgett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Santa Rosa County, 378 So. 2d 58, 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), where First District considered “the perplexing problem presented by cases . . . when there are both equitable (non-jury) and legal (jury) claims made in the same proceeding.” Padgett held that “the mixture of the two kinds of claims in the same case, regardless of the parties by whom or the sequence in which they are raised by their respective pleadings, cannot deprive either of the parties of a right to a jury trial of issue traditionally triable by jury as a matter of right.”
On appeal, the 4th District rejected the Kinneys’ argument that they were entitled to a jury trial. Here’s why:
Countrywide sued for both foreclosure and a money judgment in the same lawsuit. These two remedies overlap. Florida’s foreclosure statute, Chapter 702, Fla. Stat., provides for a two-step process. First, judgment of foreclosure is entered and the property is sold. But a money judgment does not automatically result. Only after the foreclosure sale can it be determined whether, and if so in what amount, any amount is still owed to the lender. If it turns out that the value received by the lender from the sale is less than the debt owed, the second step can be triggered – i.e., the lender seeking a deficiency judgment for the balance still owed.
Florida’s foreclosure statute expressly provides that both foreclosure and deficiency proceedings are the province of the court, not a jury. (Section 702.06, Fla. Stat.) The First District held that a foreclosure defendant does not have “a constitutional right to a jury trial in a chancery foreclosure action when a deficiency has resulted from the foreclosure sale of the property.” Bradberry v. Atl. Bank of St. Augustine, 336 So. 2d 1248, 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). A promissory note count brought in the same suit as a foreclosure count is really just an action for a deficiency judgment. Hence, there is no right to a jury on that claim.
The Kinneys also lost because their mortgage had a provision waiving their right to a jury trial. They argued that because the foreclosing plaintiff was not the original lender but rather its assignee, the plaintiff had no right to enforce this jury waiver since it was not a party to the mortgage. The 4th District had little difficulty rejecting this argument, in fact needing only a single paragraph to do so, explaining that as the holder of the note and mortgage by endorsement, the assignee/plaintiff was entitled to enforce the loan documents. For this proposition, the court cited its decision in Riggs v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 36 So.3d 932, 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- SEC Adopts New Cybersecurity Rules
- From 😊 to 💼: Can Emojis Create a Legally Binding Contract?
- HB-3: An Overview of ESG Factors Relating to Public Funds Investment and Financial Industry Impacts
- The Live Local Act Part 2 - Affordable Housing Incentives
- Florida's Live Local Act
- Florida Preliminary Injunctions Must Merely Preserve the Status Quo
- Can a Landlord Obtain Funds Deposited by Tenant in the Court’s Registry?
- Drawn-out negotiations over purchase agreement result in extensive litigation
- In eviction case, trial court wrongly made landlord produce leases with other tenants
Popular Categories
- Litigation
- Contracts
- Landlord-Tenant
- Business
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Supreme Court
- Real Estate Law
- Cyber fraud
- Technology
- Business of Real Estate
- Property Tax
- Development/Land Use
- Cybersecurity
- Data Security
- Conveyances
- Foreclosures
- Estate planning
- Trusts and Estates
- Lease
- Wealth planning
- Business
- Insurance
- Restrictive Covenants
- Title
- Construction
- Promissory Notes
- Regulatory Compliance
- Government
- Creditor's Rights
- Liens and encumbrances
- Compliance
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Eviction
- Bankruptcy
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Appeals
- Attorneys' Fees
- Employment and Labor
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Small Business
- Mortgages
- Loan guaranties
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Maritime
- GAO
- Commercial Brokerage
- Renewal
- email hacking
- Lis Pendens
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- July 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- March 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016