Worker misclassification continues to be an ongoing problem throughout the country. The effect of this has its greatest impact on low wage earners. By virtue of being misclassified as independent contractors, as opposed to employees, such workers do not have legal protections of employees, such as minimum wage and overtime protection or unemployment and worker’s compensation coverage. Further complicating matters is that determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor requires a very fact specific analysis and consideration of many factors.
For tax purposes, the IRS determines whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor by analyzing the degree of control the entity has over the worker and whether the worker is providing services independently. Generally, the considerations are behavioral, financial and contingent on the type of relationship between the worker and the entity (i.e., is there a written contract? Is the worker provided employment type benefits?). The IRS suggests companies “look at the entire relationship, consider the degree or extent of the right to direct and control, and finally, to document each of the factors used in coming up with the determination.”
If companies have a concern regarding classification for tax purposes, they can consult with the IRS. The business or the worker can submit a “Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding,” which allows the IRS to review the circumstances and make a formal determination on worker status. The IRS does warn that a determination could take at least six months. Another alternative is for the entity to participate in the Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, which provides entities with the opportunity to reclassify their workers correctly for future tax periods and allows for partial relief from federal employment taxes. In any event, entities should proceed cautiously as intentional misclassification and tax violations can be reported to the Florida Department of Revenue anonymously.
Unlike the IRS analysis, employment law analysis under the Fair Labor Standards Act focuses on the economic realities of the relationship, i.e., whether a worker is economically dependent on the alleged employer. Because of the magnitude of the misclassification problem, the Department of Labor can bring enforcement actions for minimum wage or overtime violations against those employers that it determines have misclassified its workers. Individuals who believe they were misclassified can also pursue a private right of action, individually or on a collective basis, for wage violations. Employers may be liable for liquidated damages, as well as back pay and attorney’s fees.
Finally, for both unemployment compensation and worker’s compensation purposes, in Florida, a common law 10 factor approach is used to determine whether the worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The factors are as follows:
- The extent of control the business exercises over the details of the work.
- Whether the worker is engaged in a distinct occupation or business.
- Whether the work is performed in a certain locality and is done under the direction of the business or by a specialist without supervision.
- The skill required for a particular occupation.
- Whether the business or the worker provides the instrumentalities (i.e., equipment, tools, materials, etc.) and/or the place for the worker doing the work.
- The length of time the person is providing services.
- The method of payment (by time or by job).
- Whether the work is part of the regular business of the employer.
- Whether the parties themselves believe they are creating an employer/employee relationship.
- Whether the hiring party is or is not a business.
The Florida Division of Workman’s Compensation (the “Division”) investigators routinely conduct on the job inspections to determine compliance with workman’s compensation laws. The Division takes civil enforcement action against those businesses operating without the requisite coverage. In the event of a determination of a misclassification, the likely result is a Stop Work Order, essentially stopping all business operations until the business complies with the law and pays penalties, as appropriate, with the penalty usually being two times the amount the employer would have paid in premiums for those misclassified employees within the preceding two year period. Businesses may also be penalized for failing to secure worker’s compensation coverage for each employee misclassified by the employer as an independent contractor. Penalties are assessed based on the number of misclassified workers - $2,500 per worker for the first two misclassified worker per site and $5,000 per worker after the first two misclassified worker per site.
Incorrect classification further impacts claims for reemployment assistance benefits. If a worker files a claim for reemployment assistance benefits but the business did not report the worker, the Department of Revenue will investigate the relationship between the worker and the business. Both the business and the worker will be required to submit an Independent Contractor Analysis form, which the Department reviews for purposes of issuing a determination. Determinations can be appealed to the Department of Economic Opportunity.
Proper classification of workers is critical. Misclassification can cripple a business, financially and/or in their ability to do business at all.
- Partner
Glennys Ortega Rubin is a partner in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP.
Glennys is a seasoned litigator, representing companies of all sizes in a myriad of industries and in various forums, including mediation, arbitration ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- What You Need to Know About the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America TIFIA Loan
- Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Implementation of the FTC’s New Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements
- September 4th is Almost Here: How Employers Can Prepare for the Upcoming Effective Date of the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
- Pith? Perfect for Lienors, Not So Much for Landlords: Protecting Rights When Improvements Are Made to Commercial Tenancies
Popular Categories
- Employment and Labor
- Construction
- Business of Real Estate
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Construction Litigation
- Competition
- Landlord-Tenant
- Real Estate Law
- Public Private Partnership
- Cybersecurity
- Intellectual Property
- Construction
- Appeals
- Litigation
- Development/Land Use
- Contracts
- Public Finance
- Trusts and Estates
- Data Security
- Business
- Supreme Court
- Privacy
- Technology
- Litigation (Appellate)
- IP Litigation
- Patents
- Business
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Health Care
- Foreclosures
- Trademark
- Contracting
- Financial Institutions
- Compliance
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Property Tax
- Conveyances
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Government
- Lease
- Appellate Blog
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Cyber fraud
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Infringement
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Arbitration
- Bid Protest
- International
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Restrictive Covenants
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Title
- Promissory Notes
- Small Business
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- Consumer Privacy
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- International Arbitration
- Liens
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Bidding
- Attorneys' Fees
- Inter Partes Review
- Power Generation
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Venue
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Mortgages
- Eviction
- FINRA
- Record on Appeal
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Dispute Resolution
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Maritime
- Liens
- Damages
- Briefing
- Patents - Obviousness
- Request for Proposal
- Department of Labor
- Trade Secrets
- Commercial Brokerage
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Design Professionals
- Certiorari
- email hacking
- Forum Selection
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Lis Pendens
- Banking
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Fintech
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Marketing/Advertising
- Mootness
- Preservation
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Veteran Owned Business
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Homestead
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016