In just a few short years, drones and the real-time data they collect have contributed to improvements across the construction industry, from overall project efficiency to visual progress reporting for clients and stakeholders. Many builders and owners are using drones to help document construction progress, particularly the turnover process, on projects that are often huge in scope and on sites that are often across a large swath of land. Engineers, design professionals and some subcontractors are using drones for planning and overall design or bid calculations, because they can see and analyze the project at a glance, in addition to being able to get close to otherwise hard to reach locations. The collection of real-time, visual and accurate data is collected immediately from a drone, as opposed to the slow and labor-intensive process of walking a site by foot. New innovations in software are making data collection by drone easier today than it has ever been in the past.
Drones are great for data collection, surveillance, aerial photography, surveying, documentation of construction progress, agriculture, search and rescue, and for advertising and marketing. But drone usage raises a number of legal concerns including privacy, safety and proper insurance coverage, as well as a duty to maintain video and still photo records made by drones. There can also be civil and criminal penalties associated with using drones - whether contractors or construction companies are aware of such, or not.
Construction companies using drones or individuals piloting unmanned aircrafts from a construction site, should consider whether the drone qualifies as an "aircraft" under their insurance policy, and if so, whether using, or even owning, the aircraft triggers an exclusion to coverage they otherwise believe they have. Having an established relationship with an attorney who understands the ins-and-outs of insurance coverage issues can be especially helpful. Construction attorneys are particularly adept at these issues, routinely resolving insurance coverage disputes and helping proactive businesses to avoid unanticipated liability issues by performing a review of existing operations.
Another common legal issue with drones is trespass and invasion of privacy. Individuals should refrain from engaging in an activity with a drone that would be illegal if a person was to do it themselves.
Finally, issues surrounding liability for relying on information procured by the use of drones (was it reasonable or negligent to so rely?), as well as a duty to maintain records (for how long?) created by drones, are still developing and will be litigated well into the future.
As with many remedies, an ounce of prevention is typically worth (in the litigation context) tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars of cure. If construction entities have questions concerning their commercial use of drones - whether related to fulfillment of major contract obligations or just to market the latest success story - they should seek competent legal counsel.
- Partner
Michael C. Kelley is a partner in the Orlando office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Construction Litigation Practice Group.
Michael’s practice focuses on construction, commercial and real property litigation ...
Search Blog
Subscribe Today
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Risks & Rewards of 3D Printing in the Construction Industry
- Back to (Construction) Work after COVID
- Drones in the Construction Industry
- COVID-19 Stimulus Relief and the Construction Industry
- PFAS Liability Litigation and the Construction Industry – Act Now or Pay Later
- How Evolving Technology Is Disrupting the Construction Sector
- Remaining Vigilant: Hurricane Planning in the Construction Industry
- COVID-Confusion: Force Majeure and Executive Orders
- Top Florida Legislation Affecting the Construction Industry in 2020
- Governor DeSantis Signs Bill to Increase Cap on Continuing Public Works Contracts
Popular Categories
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Construction
- Contracting
- Business
- Contracts
- General Liability
- Compliance
- Technology
- Florida Public Contracts
- Litigation
- Venue
- Insurance
- Privacy
- Technology
- Florida Procurement
- Florida Public Procurement
- Public procurement
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Contracting
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Government Contracts
- Public Contracts
- Liens
- Regulatory Compliance
- Small Business
- Damages
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- Attorneys' Fees
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Designer Liability
- Business
- Regulation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Evidence
- Expert Science
Editors
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- November 2022
- July 2021
- June 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016