As if the threat of local or state licensure investigations is not enough to induce an instant case of irritable bowel syndrome for a contractor that just realized they unwittingly ran afoul of state regulations – or already knew and just got caught - contractors would be wise to recognize that their missteps could land them in even hotter water with the United States government. There is a myriad of ways to invite a federal indictment on your construction project, but this series is limited to three of the most common construction related prosecutions by the Department of Justice. We begin with a personal and professional carcinogen: illegal asbestos removal.
Most folks do not need a primer on the severe health risks associated with asbestos and the need to have it handled with educated care. In the state of Florida that means not only making sure you have a specialized asbestos contractor license, but that you cooperate with government officials inspecting your work. Whether due to ignorance or reckless disregard, owners, developers, contractors and their minions all too often ignore the risks and expose their workers and the public to otherwise avoidable and potentially disastrous health consequences. While there are countless reports of federal prosecutions for improper asbestos removal, a Florida developer’s recent federal criminal plea deal and underlying indictment provides a representative overview of what not to do with asbestos and the hefty price that can be levied if you do it anyway.
In USA v. Philip J. Farley and Aurelijius Baltusis, 8:15CR-00133-RAP-MAP, and after already coughing up nearly $200,000 in local fines for improper asbestos removal, the two named defendants were indicted and arrested on multiple counts of criminal conspiracy and violating federal procedures. The indictment alleged the developer and his right hand man lied to county inspectors and failed to notify when certain asbestos-removal work was about to be done. After three expensive years of criminal prosecution and interim appeals, the two pled guilty and were sentenced to probation, with Farley sentenced to 4 years federal probation and assessed an additional $250,000 fine. A visit to the DOJ website or a random google search for “contractor, asbestos, federal indictment” will yield countless more examples of just how seriously the feds are prosecuting these cases in Florida and throughout the United States.
As most contractors know, Florida contractors must timely report their criminal convictions and pleas to their respective licensing board. Compared to the shark attack of federal prosecution and bankruptcy inducing fines, one might be quick to dismiss attendant state administrative prosecution to a mere ant bite. Escaping a live re-enactment of your own personal Shawshank Redemption is certainly cause for celebration. Additional administrative discipline against your license, while perhaps comparatively tame, can nevertheless darken the day of a newly minted federal convict even further with not just additional legal expense, but memorable parting gifts ranging from a slap on the wrist with probation and fines to the gut-punch of license suspension or revocation. Whatever the add-on, you need no great imagination to figure out that neither licensure discipline nor a federal criminal record is going to help you beat out your competitor.
Coming up in Part 2, the Do’s and Don’ts of Working with DBAs.
Search Blog
Subscribe Today
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Risks & Rewards of 3D Printing in the Construction Industry
- Back to (Construction) Work after COVID
- Drones in the Construction Industry
- COVID-19 Stimulus Relief and the Construction Industry
- PFAS Liability Litigation and the Construction Industry – Act Now or Pay Later
- How Evolving Technology Is Disrupting the Construction Sector
- Remaining Vigilant: Hurricane Planning in the Construction Industry
- COVID-Confusion: Force Majeure and Executive Orders
- Top Florida Legislation Affecting the Construction Industry in 2020
- Governor DeSantis Signs Bill to Increase Cap on Continuing Public Works Contracts
Popular Categories
- Construction
- Construction Litigation
- Construction
- Contracting
- Business
- Contracts
- General Liability
- Compliance
- Technology
- Florida Public Contracts
- Litigation
- Venue
- Insurance
- Privacy
- Technology
- Florida Procurement
- Florida Public Procurement
- Public procurement
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Contracting
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Government Contracts
- Public Contracts
- Regulatory Compliance
- Small Business
- Liens
- Damages
- Design Professionals
- Forum Selection
- Attorneys' Fees
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Business
- Designer Liability
- Regulation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Evidence
- Expert Science
Editors
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- November 2022
- July 2021
- June 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- November 2017
- October 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016