With proposed property tax assessments being mailed next month (and final bills being mailed in November), it’s almost the time of year where property owners think about challenging their assessments. Taxpayers must remember that filing a lawsuit to challenge your county property appraiser’s valuation of your property, or denial of an exemption from ad valorem taxes, does not get you out of paying while the suit is pending. Before filing a lawsuit, “the taxpayer shall pay to the collector not less than the amount of the tax which the taxpayer admits in good faith to be owing.” Fla. Stat. § 194.171(3). Whether to pay the entire assessment or some lesser amount is beyond the scope of this post.
What happens, though, when the lawsuit covers one tax year but goes on for more than one? The taxpayer has to pay all taxes assessed “in years after the action is brought, which the taxpayer in good faith admits to be owing…” Fla. Stat. § 194.171(5). In a case decided late last month, an appellate court answered the question of whether that requirement includes the year that the lawsuit is filed if that is not the year being challenged.
In Forest Brooke/Hillsborough, LLC v. Henriquez, the taxpayer filed a 2009 lawsuit challenging its 2008 ad valorem assessment. The taxpayer had paid its 2008 taxes (or at least the amount it admitted in good faith to be owing), but did not pay its 2009 taxes on time. The county Property Appraiser argued that the court lost jurisdiction of the case and the trial court agreed, dismissing the case. The trial court reasoned that in requiring payment “in years after the action is brought,” the Florida legislature meant to require payment of taxes for all years after the year being challenged.
The appellate court disagreed and reinstated the taxpayer’s lawsuit. The statute says the taxpayer must pay the taxes for all years “after the action is brought,’ so that’s what is required. When the taxpayer failed to pay its taxes for the year in which it filed the lawsuit, that didn’t matter under the statute. If the case goes on for many years, the taxpayer must keep paying new taxes as they come due.
The bottom line is that a taxpayer challenging its ad valorem assessments, or denial of an exemption from assessments, must be careful to pay what the statutes require. The penalty for failure to get it right is dismissal of the lawsuit.
- Partner
Matt Chait is the Managing Partner of the West Palm Beach office of Shutts & Bowen LLP, where he is a member of the Business Litigation Practice Group. His statewide practice focuses on commercial real estate and land use litigation ...
Search Blog
Subscribe Today
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Can a Landlord Obtain Funds Deposited by Tenant in the Court’s Registry?
- Drawn-out negotiations over purchase agreement result in extensive litigation
- In eviction case, trial court wrongly made landlord produce leases with other tenants
- Trial Court Wrongly Dismisses Case at Hearing on Paying Rent into Registry
- Objecting to a real estate project in Florida carries a risk of liability
- Update: Same court again takes hard line on late rent payment into court registry
- Court takes hard line on late rent payment into court registry during COVID-19
- Buying distressed debt to get the underlying property – a litigation due diligence checklist
- 10 Questions Your Litigator May Ask about Your Post-Covid Commercial Lease
- Florida’s Narrow Take on Force Majeure Clauses
Popular Categories
- Landlord-Tenant
- Conveyances
- Foreclosures
- Promissory Notes
- Lease
- Business of Real Estate
- Eviction
- Liens and encumbrances
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Attorneys' Fees
- Mortgages
- Development/Land Use
- Loan guaranties
- Title
- Restrictive Covenants
- Commercial Brokerage
- Contracts
- Renewal
- Cyber fraud
- email hacking
- Property Tax
- Lis Pendens
- Creditor's Rights
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- October 2022
- March 2022
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- March 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- February 2019
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016