The Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with unpaid family and medical leave for certain qualifying reasons. While employers should definitely know the FMLA basics (i.e., whether they are “covered employers” who employ any “eligible employees”), below are five FMLA potential “curveballs” that every employer should look out for when dealing with the FMLA:
(1) Employees Seeking FMLA Leave Do Not Need to Even Mention the FMLA
Employers and human resources professionals should be aware of the qualifying reasons for FMLA because when an employee first seeks FMLA leave, the employee does not need to even mention the FMLA. The employee must merely provide at least verbal notice sufficient to make his or her employer aware that the employee needs FMLA-qualifying leave, as well as information regarding the anticipated timing and duration of the leave. See 29 C.F.R. § 825.302(c).
(2) FMLA Interference: Liability without a Shred of Discriminatory Intent
There are two main types of claims under the FMLA: (1) interference and (2) retaliation. An FMLA interference claim requires the employee to prove that he or she was entitled to the benefit denied. An employee does not need to show that his or her employer intended to deny the right because the employer's motives are irrelevant. Therefore, an employer who unintentionally violated the FMLA could still be liable for an interference claim.
However, to succeed on a retaliation claim, an employee must demonstrate that his or her employer intentionally discriminated against him or her in the form of an adverse employment action for having exercised an FMLA right. Therefore, an employee who brings a retaliation claim faces the increased burden of showing that an impermissible retaliatory or discriminatory animus motivated his or her employer's actions.
(3) If the Employer Does Not Specify a Date Calculation Method, the Most Beneficial Outcome for the Employee is the Default
Generally, eligible employees are entitled to up to 12 weeks of FMLA leave at any time in the fixed 12-month period selected. 29 C.F.R. § 825.200(c). An employee could take 12 weeks of leave at the end of the year and 12 weeks at the beginning of the following year. Id. There are different ways that an employer may calculate the 12-month period and if the employer does not specify a method for such a calculation, then the method with “the most beneficial outcome for the employee will be used.” 29 C.F.R. § 825.200(e). Therefore, if the employer fails to specify a calculation method, the method that is the most favorable to the employee will be the default.
(4) The New Definition of “Spouse” Under the FMLA
Previously, the definition of “spouse” under the FMLA followed a “place of residence rule,” which determined whether someone met the definition of “spouse” based on the law of the state where the employee lived. However, it recently changed to a “place of celebration” rule as a result of the Department of Labor’s issuance of a Final Rule on February 25, 2015. Now, under the amended FMLA regulatory definition, eligible employees in legal same-sex marriages can take FMLA leave to care for their spouse, regardless of where they live. The Final Rule changed the regulatory definition of spouse to look to the law of the place in which the marriage was entered into, as opposed to the law of the state in which the employee resides. See 29 C.F.R. § 825.122(b).
(5) General Notice Poster Must be Readily Seen by Employees AND Applicants
The Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division published a poster that satisfies the general notice requirement, but employers are free to make their own poster so long as it contains all of the requisite information. While most employers are aware of their obligation to post the general notice poster, many do not know that it must be posted prominently where it can be readily seen by employees and applicants for employment. 29 C.F.R. § 825.300(a)(1). Additionally, covered employers must post the general notice even if they do not employ any eligible employees. 29 C.F.R. §825.300(a)(2). An employer that willfully violates the posting requirement may be assessed a civil money penalty by the Wage and Hour Division not to exceed $163 for each separate offense. 29 C.F.R. § 825.300.
- Of Counsel
Alamea Deedee Bitran is Of Counsel to Shutts & Bowen. Deedee concurrently serves as Senior Counsel at an international nonprofit that combats antisemitism through legal action. Deedee has previously represented employers ...
Search Blog
Follow Us
Recent Posts
- Breaking News: FinCEN Postpones Beneficial Ownership Reporting Deadlines for Companies Impacted by Recent Major Storms
- What You Need to Know About the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Build America TIFIA Loan
- Breaking News: Federal Judge Blocks Nationwide Implementation of the FTC’s New Rule Banning Noncompete Agreements
- September 4th is Almost Here: How Employers Can Prepare for the Upcoming Effective Date of the FTC’s Non-Compete Rule
- Florida’s New Statutory Home Warranty: What Home Builders Need to Know
- Orange County Proposes Temporary Suspension Ordinance on New Development Applications
- Raising the Roof: The U.S. Department of Labor Announces Rule Raising Salary Thresholds for Overtime Exemptions
- New Guidelines Anticipated Following HHS’s Health Cybersecurity Concept Paper
- SECURE 2.0 and Protecting Your Designated Beneficiaries
- Florida Appellate Court Provides Further Guidance Regarding New Summary Judgment Rule
Popular Categories
- Employment and Labor
- Construction
- Business of Real Estate
- Construction Litigation
- Litigation (Labor & Employment)
- Landlord-Tenant
- Competition
- Real Estate Law
- Cybersecurity
- Intellectual Property
- Public Private Partnership
- Appeals
- Construction
- Litigation
- Contracts
- Development/Land Use
- Trusts and Estates
- Data Security
- Business
- Supreme Court
- Public Finance
- Privacy
- Technology
- IP Litigation
- Litigation (Appellate)
- Patents
- Business
- Regulatory Compliance
- Florida Government Contracts
- Foreclosures
- Health Care
- Trademark
- Contracting
- Financial Institutions
- Compliance
- Estate planning
- International Dispute Resolution
- Property Tax
- Florida Public Contracts
- Government Contracting
- Government Contracts
- Conveyances
- Government
- Lease
- Appellate Blog
- Patent Office
- Insurance
- Wealth planning
- Federal Government Contracting
- Florida Bid Protests
- Public Contracts
- Cyber fraud
- Infringement
- Proposal Writing
- Public Bidding
- GAO
- International Arbitration and Litigation
- Bid Protest
- Arbitration
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- International
- Restrictive Covenants
- Grant Writing
- Copyright
- Promissory Notes
- Title
- Small Business
- Florida Procurement
- Public procurement
- Consumer Privacy
- PTAB
- General Liability
- Technology
- International Arbitration
- Liens
- Liens and encumbrances
- Creditor's Rights
- Bidding
- Attorneys' Fees
- Inter Partes Review
- Power Generation
- Consumer Protection
- Regulation
- Contracting
- Government Vendor
- State Government Contracts
- Venue
- Ad Valorem Assessments
- Florida Administrative Law
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Bankruptcy
- Florida Public Procurement
- Russia-Related Arbitration
- Mortgages
- Eviction
- Record on Appeal
- FINRA
- Rehearing
- Loan guaranties
- Patents - Assignor Estoppel
- Dispute Resolution
- Statute of limitations
- Statute of repose
- Liens
- Maritime
- Damages
- Briefing
- Request for Proposal
- Patents - Obviousness
- Commercial Brokerage
- Department of Labor
- Trade Secrets
- Bid Writing
- Florida Bidding Strategies
- Renewal
- Attorneys' Fees
- Florida County Lands
- Florida Economic Incentive Packages
- Jury Instructions
- Stay
- Certiorari
- Design Professionals
- email hacking
- Forum Selection
- Assignment of Contract
- Assignment of Proceeds
- Offers of Judgment
- Prevailing Party
- Settlements
- Banking
- Designer Liability
- Finality
- Fintech
- Lis Pendens
- Appellate Jurisdiction - Deadlines
- Evidence
- Evidence
- Expert
- Expert Science
- Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- Marketing/Advertising
- Preservation
- Unlicensed Contracting
- Federal Supply Schedule
- Florida Public Records Law
- Mootness
- Socio-Economic Programs
- Sunshine Law
- Veteran Owned Business
- Homestead
- Partnerships and LLCs
- Standing
Editors
- Of Counsel
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
- Of Counsel
- Senior Associate
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Associate
- Partner
- Partner
- Partner
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- February 2024
- November 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016